Original Research

The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of non-osseous knee injury at Steve Biko Academic Hospital

Nashil Singh, Heleen Hanekom, Farhana E. Suleman
South African Journal of Radiology | Vol 23, No 1 | a1754 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v23i1.1754 | © 2019 Nashil Singh, Heleen Hanekom, Farhana E. Suleman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 May 2019 | Published: 25 September 2019

About the author(s)

Nashil Singh, Department of Radiology, University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
Heleen Hanekom, Department of Radiology, University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
Farhana E. Suleman, Department of Radiology, University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa


Background: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has internationally been proven to reduce unnecessary knee arthroscopies and assist with surgical planning. This has the advantage of avoiding unnecessary surgery and the associated anaesthetic risk, as well as reducing costs. No data were found in the recently published literature assessing the accuracy of MRI interpretation of knee ligament injury in the public sector locally.

Objectives: This pilot study aimed to determine the accuracy of MRI in detecting non-osseous knee injury in a resource-limited tertiary-level academic hospital in Pretoria, South Africa, compared to the gold standard arthroscopy findings.

Method: This was an exploratory retrospective analysis of 39 patients who had MRI and arthroscopy at Steve Biko Academic Hospital (SBAH). True positive, true negative, false positive and false negative results were extrapolated from findings in both modalities and translated into sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for each structure.

Results: Negative predictive values were recorded as 97%, 81%, 90% and 100% (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL], medial meniscus [MM], lateral meniscus [LM] and posterior cruciate ligament [PCL], respectively), which were comparative to recently published international literature. The PPV results were lower than those previously evaluated at 55%, 58%, 55% and not applicable. The sensitivities and specificities of the ligaments were 83%, 58%, 83% and not applicable; and 87%, 81%, 70% and not applicable, respectively.

Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging was found to be sensitive and specific, with a high NPV noted in all structures evaluated. Negative results can therefore be used to avoid unnecessary surgery to the benefit of the patient and state. The study reiterates that high accuracy can be obtained from MRI on a 1.5-tesla non-dedicated scanner, with interpretation by generalist radiologists.


Musculoskeletal; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; anterior cruciate ligament; ACL; posterior cruciate ligament; PCL; medial meniscus; lateral meniscus.


Total abstract views: 2141
Total article views: 2947


Crossref Citations

1. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. arthroscopy in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries - is there a difference
Milan Mirkovic, Aleksandar Crnobaric, Sanja Mirkovic, Andreja Baljozovic, Vladan Stevanovic, Miodrag Glisic, Aleksandar Jevtic, Nemanja Slavkovic, Zoran Bascarevic
Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo  vol: 150  issue: 11-12  first page: 675  year: 2022  
doi: 10.2298/SARH220524090M