Original Research

Retrospective study of detecting oesophageal injuries post neck trauma: CTA versus fluoroscopy

Audrey R. Rumhumha, Nicholas Christofides, Pravani Moodley
South African Journal of Radiology | Vol 28, No 1 | a2930 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2930 | © 2024 Audrey R. Rumhumha, Nicholas Christofides, Pravani Moodley | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 29 April 2024 | Published: 09 September 2024

About the author(s)

Audrey R. Rumhumha, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Nicholas Christofides, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Pravani Moodley, Department of Family Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Timely detection of oesophageal injuries post-penetrating neck trauma is imperative because of the associated high morbidity and mortality. Patients commonly undergo both CT angiography (CTA) and contrast swallow studies (fluoroscopic oesophagography) when oesophageal injury is suspected.

Objectives: To determine the radiological findings of oesophageal injury after penetrating neck trauma comparing CTA and fluoroscopic oesophagography at a single tertiary centre.

Method: The study retrospectively reviewed the data from CTA and fluoroscopic oesophagography reports of patients suspected of oesophageal injuries secondary to penetrating neck trauma at a tertiary hospital in South Africa from January 2018 to December 2022.

Results: A total of 76 records were reviewed. The mean age for the participants was 31.5 years, ranging from 0.75–66 years. In this study 6/76 (8%) patients had confirmed oesophageal injury on fluoroscopy, which is considered the gold standard. The majority of penetrating neck injuries were in the 20–29 year age group, with 33/76 (43%) injuries. Stab wounds as the mechanism of injury accounted for 57/76 (75%). Dysphagia was experienced by 10/76 (13%) of those who had injuries. Zone I injuries accounted for 33/76 (43%) of the injuries.

Conclusion: The incidence of oesophageal injuries secondary to penetrating neck injuries is comparable to previous studies. This study determined that CTA has a high sensitivity but low specificity.

Contribution: Fluoroscopic oesophagography should, therefore, be performed in patients who have an abnormal CTA coupled with clinical signs and symptoms of oesophageal injury.


Keywords

oesophageal injury; penetrating neck trauma; CTA; fluoroscopy; fluoroscopic oesophagography.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 196
Total article views: 135


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.