Original Research

Comparison of sonourethrography and retrograde urethrography in the evaluation of anterior urethral strictures

N. Khan, H.M Modishi, L.D.R. Tsatsi, A. Kahloon, A. Segone
South African Journal of Radiology | Vol 8, No 4 | a101 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v8i4.101 | © 2004 N. Khan, H.M Modishi, L.D.R. Tsatsi, A. Kahloon, A. Segone | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 21 February 2004 | Published: 25 June 2004

About the author(s)

N. Khan, Department of Diagnostic Radiolow, Medical University of Southem Afnca, South Africa
H.M Modishi, Department of Diagnostic Radiolow, Medical University of Southem Afnca, South Africa
L.D.R. Tsatsi, Department of Diagnostic Radiolow, Medical University of Southem Afnca, South Africa
A. Kahloon, Department of Urology, Medical University of Southern Africa, South Africa
A. Segone, Department of Urology, Medical University of Southern Africa, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (1MB)

Abstract

Radiographic retrograde urethrography (RUG) has traditionally been the preferred technique used by urologists to image the anterior urethra. Since originally described by McAninch et aL in 1988, ultrasonic imaging of the urethra has evolved into a powerful and clinically useful tool for the accurate delineation of urethral pathology. However the posterior urethra cannot be assessed reliably using this technique. Sonourethrography has proved to be more accurate than conventional radiographic urethrography in measuring stricture length throughout the anterior urethra. The objective and purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of sonourethrography in the evaluation of anterior urethral strictures and also to explain its many advantages over traditional imaging technique.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 4699
Total article views: 2074


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.